http://missoulian.com/news/opinion/mailbag/assisted-suicide-recipe-for-elder-abuse/article_261d7ce0-3e1f-11e2-8f87-001a4bcf887a.html
December 04, 2012 7:45 am
Brad Williams (letter, Nov. 28) is correct, assisted suicide is not legal in Montana (Associated Press, Nov. 16). The Montana Supreme Court decision, Baxter v. State, merely gives doctors a potential defense to prosecution for homicide.
In the 2011 legislative session, Sen. Anders Blewett and I introduced competing bills in response to Baxter, neither of which passed. His bill sought to legalize assisted suicide; mine sought to eliminate the defense.
During the hearing on Blewett's bill, he conceded that assisted suicide was not legal under Baxter. He said: "under the current law ... there's nothing to protect the doctor from prosecution."
Similar statements were made by others. For example, Dr. Stephen Speckart testified: "most physicians feel significant disease with the limited safeguards and possible risk of criminal prosecution after the Baxter decision."
To view a transcript, see: http://maasdocuments.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/blewett_speckhart_trans_001.pdf
Legal assisted suicide is, regardless, a recipe for elder abuse in which heirs are empowered to pressure and abuse older people to cut short their lives.
Assisted suicide is not legal in Montana. The potential defense to prosecution is, however, a "toe in the door," which could lead to legalization in the future. Tell your legislators that you support reversing the defense to keep assisted suicide out of Montana.
Sen. Greg Hinkle, Thompson Falls
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Saturday, December 8, 2012
“Dr. Stevens, you saved my life!”
Doctor helped patient with cancer choose life over assisted suicide
November 27, 2012 6:15
Oregon’s assisted-suicide law applies to patients predicted to have less than six months to live. In 2000, I had a cancer patient named Jeanette Hall. Another doctor had given her a terminal diagnosis of six months to a year to live. This was based on her not being treated for cancer.
At our first meeting, Jeanette told me that she did not want to be treated, and that she wanted to opt for what our law allowed – to kill herself with a lethal dose of barbiturates.
I did not and do not believe in assisted suicide. I informed her that her cancer was treatable and that her prospects were good. But she wanted “the pills.” She had made up her mind, but she continued to see me.
On the third or fourth visit, I asked her about her family and learned that she had a son. I asked her how he would feel if she went through with her plan. Shortly after that, she agreed to be treated, and her cancer was cured.
Five years later she saw me in a restaurant and said, “Dr. Stevens, you saved my life!”
For her, the mere presence of legal assisted suicide had steered her to suicide.
I understand that assisted suicide will be an issue in your upcoming legislative session. I urge you to encourage your legislators to clarify your law to keep assisted suicide out of Montana.
Kenneth Stevens,
Sherwood, Oregon
Friday, December 7, 2012
Assisted suicide leaves no room for doctors' errors or erroneous prognostications
Jeanette Hall's letter ( "Assisted suicide prompts some terminally ill patients to give up on life prematurely"), about how she would have died from assisted suicide if her doctor hadn't talked her out of it, hit a nerve. Her stated motivation was that she had been diagnosed with cancer and given six months to a year to live. That was 12 years ago.
Doctors do not know the future. They are often wrong. Indeed, this has happened twice in my family.
The first time was with my father. At age 66, he collapsed as he was leaving a doctor's appointment in the hospital at Glasgow. A week or so later his doctor recommended that we "pull the plug." I instead moved my father to another hospital. He fully recovered and lived nine more years. The doctor was wrong.
The second time was with me. When I was 62 years old, I was paralyzed due to a disease and put on a respirator. After four months, my doctors offered to take me off the respirator. They said that there was no chance of recovery. They said that if I lived, I would always be respirator dependent and a quadriplegic. Instead, I eventually lost my paralysis and even went back to work. My doctors, excellent doctors with years of experience, were wrong. It is now 14 years later.
Proponents of assisted suicide sometimes claim that assisted suicide is no different than pulling the plug. This is untrue. When you pull the plug, the patient doesn't necessarily die. If the patient does die, he or she dies due to his or her illness, not a lethal overdose.
I hope that we can keep assisted suicide out of Montana.
Jerry and Dora Lou Jacobson,
Glasgow
Assisted suicide: Idea is repugnant
I was glad to see the letter in your publication by Brad Williams (Nov. 28). Assisted suicide is an important topic for Montana, where proponents are wrongly claiming that the practice is legal and the majority of the population are senior citizens (over 50 years of age).
I retired from the Motion Picture Pension and Health Plans in Studio City, Calif., as the chief financial officer. One reason that I retired to Montana was that I had the perception that it was senior-citizen friendly, i.e., unlike Oregon and Washington, which have adopted laws allowing doctors and family members to assist people in killing themselves. That was repugnant to me.
The proposed legalization is for terminally ill persons. "Terminally ill" is a term that I am all too familiar with. In my previous employment, one would need to be terminally ill to qualify for a pension if they had not reached a specified age. Many, many times doctors deemed someone terminally ill and they wound up outliving their caregivers; not really, but they lived many years. If these persons had instead been applying for a lethal dose and used it, they would have been dead before their time.
Ted Friesen, Bigfork
Labels:
aid in dying,
death with dignity,
Oregon,
terminally ill,
Washington
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)